Subject: Re: [boost] [Interprocess] Named pipe interface proposal
From: yuri kilochek (yuri.kilochek_at_[hidden])
Date: 2013-08-12 03:26:59
Exactly. It is a low level thing supposed to be wrapped in
std::basic_istream/std::basic_ostream for high level stuff. Do not reinvent
the wheel, study the design of standard library if you want consistency.
12 Ð°Ð²Ð³. 2013 Ð³. 11:12 Ð¿Ð¾Ð»ÑÐ·Ð¾Ð²Ð°ÑÐµÐ»Ñ "Geoff Shannon" <geoffpshannon_at_[hidden]>
> On Sun, Aug 11, 2013 at 10:09 PM, yuri kilochek <yuri.kilochek_at_[hidden]
> > Why not derive from std::streambuf overriding appropriate functions?
> > it the standard way to deal with custom data streams?
> It doesn't seem like it's quite what I'm looking for. For instance this SO
> streambuf seems to indicate that it's something of an implementation
> detail, and thus not appropriate for a high-level interface. I think the
> Boost.Asio buffer class is much more appropriate.
> -- Geoff
> Nothing is ever easy.
> Unsubscribe & other changes:
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk