Subject: Re: [boost] [Interprocess] Named pipe interface proposal
From: Rob Stewart (robertstewart_at_[hidden])
Date: 2013-08-12 05:30:14
On Aug 12, 2013, at 1:09 AM, yuri kilochek <yuri.kilochek_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> Why not derive from std::streambuf overriding appropriate functions? Isn't
> it the standard way to deal with custom data streams?
Please don't top post or overquote on this list.
streambufs have virtual functions which add unwanted generalization for this purpose.
(Sent from my portable computation engine)
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk