Re: [boost] [Interprocess] Named pipe interface proposal

Subject: Re: [boost] [Interprocess] Named pipe interface proposal
From: Rob Stewart (robertstewart_at_[hidden])
Date: 2013-08-12 05:30:14

On Aug 12, 2013, at 1:09 AM, yuri kilochek <yuri.kilochek_at_[hidden]> wrote:

> Why not derive from std::streambuf overriding appropriate functions? Isn't
> it the standard way to deal with custom data streams?

Please don't top post or overquote on this list.

streambufs have virtual functions which add unwanted generalization for this purpose.

___
Rob

(Sent from my portable computation engine)