Re: [boost] [Interprocess] Named pipe interface proposal

Subject: Re: [boost] [Interprocess] Named pipe interface proposal
From: yuri kilochek (yuri.kilochek_at_[hidden])
Date: 2013-08-12 12:21:36

On 12 Aug 2013 at 13:30 Rob Stewart <robertstewart_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> Please don't top post or overquote on this list.
Okay, though it feels strange to reply to the latest post when I actually
am commenting on the first one.
> streambufs have virtual functions which add unwanted generalization for
this purpose.
Why exactly is generalization unwanted?
On 12 Aug 2013 at 19:59 Niall Douglas <ndouglas_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>I would URGE you to make this exclusively a Boost.ASIO implementation.
This is an even better idea. +1.