Subject: Re: [boost] concurrent_unordered_map request
From: Nevin Liber (nevin_at_[hidden])
Date: 2013-08-20 15:40:52
On 20 August 2013 14:06, adrien courdavault <adrien.courdavault_at_[hidden]>wrote:
> You mean lock free?
> Because if I understood well the updated containers with c++11
> standard will be thread safe because of the definition of const.
No, they won't.
The are "safe" in the sense that you can call non-modifying functions in
different threads without synchronization as long as no one is calling a
modifying function, but that really isn't the guarantee people are looking
for when they want a "thread-safe" data structure.
-- Nevin ":-)" Liber <mailto:nevin_at_[hidden]> (847) 691-1404
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk