Re: [boost] concurrent_unordered_map request

Subject: Re: [boost] concurrent_unordered_map request
From: Klaim - Joël Lamotte (mjklaim_at_[hidden])
Date: 2013-08-20 20:34:17

On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 11:45 PM, Nigel Pattinson <
nigel.pattinson_at_[hidden]> wrote:

> Planned for inclusion are queue, stack, set,
> map, unordered set and unordered map, all in coarse grained and fine
> grained versions.
>

Does stack and queue implementation or features overlap with the lockfree
implementations?

I'll be interested in trying your libraries in my current project once you
publish them for review.

Joel Lamotte