Re: [boost] concurrent_unordered_map request

Subject: Re: [boost] concurrent_unordered_map request
From: Nigel Pattinson (nigel.pattinson_at_[hidden])
Date: 2013-08-22 22:49:27

> Does stack and queue implementation or features overlap with the lockfree
> implementations?

I've only glanced at the lockfree versions, the implementations don't
overlap but the features probably do.

Nigel

On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 12:34 PM, Klaim - Joël Lamotte <mjklaim_at_[hidden]>wrote:

> On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 11:45 PM, Nigel Pattinson <
> nigel.pattinson_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>
> > Planned for inclusion are queue, stack, set,
> > map, unordered set and unordered map, all in coarse grained and fine
> > grained versions.
> >
>
> Does stack and queue implementation or features overlap with the lockfree
> implementations?
>
> I'll be interested in trying your libraries in my current project once you
> publish them for review.
>
> Joel Lamotte
>
> _______________________________________________
> Unsubscribe & other changes:
> http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
>