Subject: Re: [boost] NuGet packages for boost
From: Ben Craig (ben.craig_at_[hidden])
Date: 2013-09-19 09:13:25
> Are you aware of the modularization plan for boost?
I'm aware now :). I have seen Jens Weller's Boost dependency analyzer (
) and I was pretty sure that it was related to efforts like this.
> Note also that even with code in separate git repos, there is currently
> a complex mesh of interdependencies between the repos/libraries. The
> real work is to do actual modularization of the code:
I think that the modularization effort has a lot of value. I don't think
it is necessary for NuGet though. As I understand the modularization
effort, it is also trying to express the dependencies between headers-only
libraries. For NuGet, I would likely just put all the headers in a
"boost_includes" package. Sergey has already demonstrated that such an
approach is possible.
That said, Google hasn't shown me any documentation on binary-library
dependencies. This can be determined empirically, but I am afraid of the
information getting stale.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk