Re: [boost] [thread] synchronized_value: value and move semantics

Subject: Re: [boost] [thread] synchronized_value: value and move semantics
From: Klaim - Joël Lamotte (mjklaim_at_[hidden])
Date: 2013-09-24 12:12:31

On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 8:48 PM, Vicente J. Botet Escriba <
vicente.botet_at_[hidden]> wrote:

> I could change it if there is an agreement of the Boost community.

(sorry for the delay, I missed this one)

I agree that it should be changed, in synchronized_value the value part is
not necessary, and very verbose.

I have another question:
Why is there no move operator? I see a move constructor but no move
operator, but I suppose it could be implemented if T is movable?
Or is it not possible?