Re: [boost] [clang] How to use CLang for Windows?

Subject: Re: [boost] [clang] How to use CLang for Windows?
From: Jonathan Wakely (jwakely.boost_at_[hidden])
Date: 2013-09-24 13:22:47

On 24 September 2013 18:12, Niall Douglas wrote:
> On 24 Sep 2013 at 13:41, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>
>> Beman said they want bug reports, so http://llvm.org/bugs/ seem the
>> obvious choice.
>>
>> Mailing lists are a poor way to report bugs. If noone happens to be
>> interested in looking into it that day then the mail goes unreplied
>> and gets forgotten.  Bug reports hang around until someone addresses
>> them.
>
> +1 on that. I've had a very good experience so far with the LLVM bug
> tracker as compared to the GCC bug tracker. Where on GCC's tracker
> you really need to prove a bug is incontravertibly true for it to not
> get autoclosed,

That's clearly not true, based just on the number of open UNCONFIRMED
bugs in GCC's  bugzilla!  We can be pretty militant about seting bugs
to WAITING if the report doesn't provide enough information, but I
dispute that bugs are "autoclosed" without good reason.