|
|
Boost : |
Subject: Re: [boost] Review request: Bumping borland, SunPro, mwerks and MPW compiler requirements
From: Daniel James (daniel_at_[hidden])
Date: 2013-09-27 07:48:40
On 27 September 2013 12:12, Stephen Kelly <steveire_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>
> So, if looks like requiring a minimum value for __BORLANDC__ of 0x610,
> as I have in the patch I posted, is reasonable, right?
No. Someone's still using an older version and I don't see any good
reason to stop them. The question is not, "why should we continue to
allow an old compiler?", it's "why shouldn't we?".
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk