Boost logo

Boost :

Subject: Re: [boost] [clang][Windows] Volunteer for a Boost regression test runner for Clang on Windows
From: Joshua Boyce (raptorfactor_at_[hidden])
Date: 2013-09-30 01:59:13


On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 8:54 AM, Edward Diener <eldiener_at_[hidden]>wrote:

> On 9/29/2013 4:09 PM, Jim Bell wrote:
>
>>
>> On 2013-09-29 2:54 PM, Beman Dawes wrote:
>>
>>> Chandler Carruth has asked for a volunteer to start running boost
>>> regression tests for the Clang on Windows project.
>>>
>>> For more about this project, see
>>> http://blog.llvm.org/2013/09/**a-path-forward-for-llvm-**
>>> toolchain-on.html<http://blog.llvm.org/2013/09/a-path-forward-for-llvm-toolchain-on.html>
>>> .
>>>
>>> Chandler cornered me at the C++ committee meeting last week, and
>>> emphasized
>>> how much they would like to see boost tests passing using Clang in a
>>> Visual
>>> Studio environment. This would be a big plus for boost developers and
>>> users
>>> in the Windows environment IMO, so I hope we can help them out.
>>>
>>
>> FWIW, I started on a Clang regression (using some mgw-w64 version), but
>> quit when I found that it would only build static libraries, which
>> caused a huge swath of tests to fail for that reason alone.
>>
>> I don't recall it misbehaving badly in other cases, though I may not
>> have looked too closely.
>>
>
> Really ? Try 'bjam toolset=clang" under Windows in the Boost preprocessor
> test directory.
>
>
>
>
> ______________________________**_________________
> Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/**
> mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost<http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost>
>

Using toolset=clang on Windows still gives "clang-linux" for me, which
needs to be fixed. We also need to distinguish between 'native' Clang and
'mingw-w64' Clang (see me other post) as they use an entirely different
standard library and CRT.


Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk