Subject: Re: [boost] Review request: Require compiler support for partial template specialization.
From: Stephen Kelly (steveire_at_[hidden])
Date: 2013-10-01 10:39:45
On 10/01/2013 04:14 PM, Mathias Gaunard wrote:
> On 01/10/13 14:49, Stephen Kelly wrote:
>> I don't understand even the motivation for Mathias' question.
>> It seems to be a restatement of what I wrote in the commit message of
>> the commit I posted, with an added 'basically', and a mistake (5.3
>> instead of 5.4, which is what I wrote in my commit message).
>> I don't know if he simply did not read my commit message at all. If he
>> did, he also missed this:
> My bad, I went through the diff and looked at what it changed, but
> didn't see the commit message at the top.
Yes, that's unfortunate. It caused a lot of confusion and mails which
are best avoided, distracting attention away from the actual point of
> Anyway I don't think dropping those compilers is a problem.
> It would be interesting to see how much of Boost can be simplified by
> removing BOOST_NO_TEMPLATE_PARTIAL_SPECIALIZATION everywhere.
Now that there's no confusion anymore (I hope), let's see if anyone else
has anything to say too.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk