Subject: Re: [boost] Support for BOOST_NO_TEMPLATE_PARTIAL_SPECIALIZATION
From: Stephen Kelly (steveire_at_[hidden])
Date: 2013-10-14 07:03:10
On 10/14/2013 12:57 PM, Daniel James wrote:
> Most of the responses have been about things which cause compile
> failures on recent compilers. That isn't going to catch everything.
The reported problems regarded typos resulting in preprocessing failure,
not compile failure.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk