Subject: Re: [boost] [winapi] Default target Windows version
From: Lars Viklund (zao_at_[hidden])
Date: 2013-10-16 04:46:44
On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 02:20:36AM +0400, Andrey Semashev wrote:
> On Tuesday 15 October 2013 23:05:45 Olaf van der Spek wrote:
> > What's the concrete advantage of defaulting to Vista? Performance?
> Yes, mostly. Vista has builtin support for condition variables and read/write
> mutexes, for example. Compiler-based TLS can be used safely with dlls.
> GetTickCount64 can also be useful in some contexts and is difficult to
> emulate. All these features will find their use at least in Boost.Sync and
> Boost.Log (the latter currently uses its own protocol for enabling use of
> these APIs, but it will be ported eventually).
Some of the things I really look forward to when I personally can drop XP
support is the Slim Reader/Writer (SRW) Locks , the ability to
specify relative RPATHs in manifests, SHGetKnownFolderPath (actually
handles paths longer than MAX_PATH) .
There are a lot of neat stuff all over the API which is gated by being
-- Lars Viklund | zao_at_[hidden]
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk