Subject: Re: [boost] [git] [conversion] Schedule and remaining showstoppers?
From: Beman Dawes (bdawes_at_[hidden])
Date: 2013-10-16 13:27:32
On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 12:42 PM, Robert Ramey <ramey_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> Daniel Pfeifer wrote:
> It's the hideous complexity of doing a perfect conversion, not
> >>> specific issues.
> >> We are not trying to do a perfect conversion. We are trying to do a
> >> reasonably good conversion and then move on.
> > I think we had a reasonably good conversion at BoostCon 2012.
> > Our approach was rejected by the community so we started a new
> > approach, this time aiming for perfect conversion.
> The enemy of improvement is the insistence on perfection.
> Irrelevant question:Will the new system be perfect?
> Simple question #1: Will we be better off converting than we are now?
Very strong yes to that one!
> Simple question #2: Will the improvement be worth the cost in pain an
The pain and suffering is short term.
The improvements are long term.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk