Subject: Re: [boost] [modularization] Modularizing Boost (modularization)
From: Bjorn Reese (breese_at_[hidden])
Date: 2013-10-18 08:38:49
On 10/18/2013 01:18 PM, Beman Dawes wrote:
> I wasn't aware that phase 0 was aborted. Why was that?
If I understood it correctly, it was due to concerns from various
library maintainers that the removal of compiler workarounds from
matured libraries may introduce new and subtle flaws that would have
to be ironed out.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk