Subject: Re: [boost] [modularization] Modularizing Boost (modularization)
From: Daniel James (daniel_at_[hidden])
Date: 2013-10-18 09:33:23
On 18 October 2013 14:18, Stephen Kelly <steveire_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> Why all the branches? That seems to just add a lot of complexity as a
> result of trying to do this after converting to git.
> Why not create the functional_hash module now, before converting to git?
> Then there are never two modules to keep in sync.
I'd rather take on the entire burden of doing this, than put even a
small portion of it on the modularization effort. This way they won't
to deal with a module splitting, and won't have to work out how to
deal with header files moving from one module to another. Chances are
the functional_hash module's history would only go back to the
creation of the module, which isn't what I'd want.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk