Re: [boost] [modularization] Modularizing Boost (modularization)

Subject: Re: [boost] [modularization] Modularizing Boost (modularization)
From: Edward Diener (eldiener_at_[hidden])
Date: 2013-10-18 16:28:36

On 10/18/2013 3:28 PM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> On 18 October 2013 18:04, Edward Diener wrote:
>> On 10/18/2013 12:37 PM, Stephen Kelly wrote:
>>>
>>> I suggest you do your equivalent of this:
>>>
>>>    boost-trunk/boost/property_map{master}$ git grep boost/graph
>>>
>>> I won't ruin the surprise for you by pasting the output.
>>>
>>> If you don't understand my point after seeing the output, please just
>>> accept that you don't understand the point. No need to respond. A long
>>> sub-thread like this is bad.
>>
>>
>> No a sub-thread like this is not bad. When you feel entitled to do things
>> without valid justification that is bad. And when you talk in condescending
>> terms to others that is bad. If you cannot or are unwilling to explain and
>> defend the reasons why you are doing what you are doing in terms of Boost
>> libraries/files I for one don't think you should be able to do those things.
>
> Did you run the command he suggested?  Is the output not justification?

I am not using git but svn, like the majority of people. I missed the 
property_map 'parallel' sub-directory in my editor's search.