Re: [boost] [modularization] Modularizing Boost (modularization)

Subject: Re: [boost] [modularization] Modularizing Boost (modularization)
From: Jonathan Wakely (jwakely.boost_at_[hidden])
Date: 2013-10-18 15:28:54

On 18 October 2013 18:04, Edward Diener wrote:
> On 10/18/2013 12:37 PM, Stephen Kelly wrote:
>>
>> I suggest you do your equivalent of this:
>>
>>   boost-trunk/boost/property_map{master}$ git grep boost/graph
>>
>> I won't ruin the surprise for you by pasting the output.
>>
>> If you don't understand my point after seeing the output, please just
>> accept that you don't understand the point. No need to respond. A long
>> sub-thread like this is bad.
>
>
> No a sub-thread like this is not bad. When you feel entitled to do things
> without valid justification that is bad. And when you talk in condescending
> terms to others that is bad. If you cannot or are unwilling to explain and
> defend the reasons why you are doing what you are doing in terms of Boost
> libraries/files I for one don't think you should be able to do those things.

Did you run the command he suggested?  Is the output not justification?