Subject: Re: [boost] [git] [conversion] Schedule and remaining showstoppers?
From: Dave Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2013-10-20 23:43:54
on Wed Oct 16 2013, "Niall Douglas" <s_sourceforge-AT-nedprod.com> wrote:
> Before any of this, in my opinion we need to find out with real
> empirical evidence how good the quality of the git conversion is.
> That, in my opinion, requires a full build and automated test run for
> every matching git commit and svn commit going back through history
> to determine their level of equivalence, and at what point in history
> equivalence breaks down.
Never gonna happen. The filesystem structure is changed, and there's no
reason to expect commits in ancient history to build.
-- Dave Abrahams
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk