Subject: Re: [boost] [git help] Documenting common modular boost workflows
From: Peter Dimov (lists_at_[hidden])
Date: 2013-10-21 21:39:58
Beman Dawes wrote:
> > And do the test runners work off âdevelop,â âmaster,â ârelease,â or does
> > it shift depending where we are in the release cycle?
> That's a whole topic in of itself, and may have different answers for the
> short term and the long term. I don't want to waste CPU cycles on that
> until the basic local machine docs are further along.
You would be putting the carriage before the horse then. What the testers
test and how a release is prepared determine how a library maintainer works,
not vice versa.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk