Re: [boost] [git help] Documenting common modular boost workflows

Subject: Re: [boost] [git help] Documenting common modular boost workflows
From: Peter Dimov (lists_at_[hidden])
Date: 2013-10-21 21:39:58

Beman Dawes wrote:
> > And do the test runners work off “develop,” “master,” “release,” or does 
> > it shift depending where we are in the release cycle?
>
> That's a whole topic in of itself, and may have different answers for the 
> short term and the long term. I don't want to waste CPU cycles on that 
> until the basic local machine docs are further along.

You would be putting the carriage before the horse then. What the testers 
test and how a release is prepared determine how a library maintainer works, 
not vice versa.