Subject: Re: [boost] VC2013 1.55 beta failures
From: Klaim - JoÃ«l Lamotte (mjklaim_at_[hidden])
Date: 2013-10-23 12:02:52
On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 5:48 PM, Beman Dawes <bdawes_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> Should we continue to define BOOST_NO_CXX11_VARIADIC_TEMPLATES for VC++
> 2013, or should we not define it and get signals2 working with a problem
> specific workaround?
> I have a weak preference for not defining it, but would very much like to
> hear opinions for anyone, but particularly release managers.
My humble opinion is to not define it and implement workarounds in specific
libraries until VC is fixed.
I'm compiling boost trunk again right now, with variadic templates
activated, to confirm if it would hurt my project but last time I tried it
was not the main issue.
That being said, did someone tried the test suite with vc12 already with
variadic templates activated?
If not I'm willing to try after I've finished checking if my project
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk