Re: [boost] VC2013 1.55 beta failures

Subject: Re: [boost] VC2013 1.55 beta failures
From: Peter Dimov (lists_at_[hidden])
Date: 2013-10-23 12:02:16

Beman Dawes wrote:
> Should we continue to define BOOST_NO_CXX11_VARIADIC_TEMPLATES for VC++ 
> 2013, or should we not define it and get signals2 working with a problem 
> specific workaround?

Get signals2 working, I'd say. The variadic constructor is already a bit 
broken in that it incorrectly accepts zero arguments, so why not just 
constrain it to two or more.

template<class A1, class A2, class... Args>
slot( A1 const& a1, A2 const& a2, Args const&... args )
{ ... }