Subject: Re: [boost] [containers] Are there flat_map/set and stable_vector proposals at work?
From: Rob Stewart (robertstewart_at_[hidden])
Date: 2013-10-24 18:10:28
On Oct 24, 2013, at 6:07 AM, Klaim - JoÃ«l Lamotte <mjklaim_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 11:58 AM, Rob Stewart <robertstewart_at_[hidden]>wrote:
>> Still, that flexibility allows the use of std::array, shared memory containers, etc.
> I'm not sure what you mean by std::array? Wouldn't it change the semantic of flat_* and impose a specific implementation?
I meant that stack allocated memory could be used if std::array's interface satisfies the needs of flat_*. std::array can be one choice among many.
(Sent from my portable computation engine)
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk