Subject: Re: [boost] [containers] Are there flat_map/set and stable_vector proposals at work?
From: Nevin Liber (nevin_at_[hidden])
Date: 2013-10-25 14:00:01
On 24 October 2013 17:10, Rob Stewart <robertstewart_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> I meant that stack allocated memory could be used if std::array's
> interface satisfies the needs of flat_*. std::array can be one choice among
I'm not seeing how a container of exactly N elements would be useful as a
backing store for flat_xxx. Could you show an example?
-- Nevin ":-)" Liber <mailto:nevin_at_[hidden]> (847) 691-1404
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk