Re: [boost] [containers] Are there flat_map/set and stable_vector proposals at work?

Subject: Re: [boost] [containers] Are there flat_map/set and stable_vector proposals at work?
From: Nevin Liber (nevin_at_[hidden])
Date: 2013-10-25 14:00:01

On 24 October 2013 17:10, Rob Stewart <robertstewart_at_[hidden]> wrote:

> I meant that stack allocated memory could be used if std::array's
> interface satisfies the needs of flat_*. std::array can be one choice among
> many.

I'm not seeing how a container of exactly N elements would be useful as a
backing store for flat_xxx.  Could you show an example?
-- 
 Nevin ":-)" Liber  <mailto:nevin_at_[hidden]>  [phone]