Re: [boost] [containers] Are there flat_map/set and stable_vector proposals at work?

Subject: Re: [boost] [containers] Are there flat_map/set and stable_vector proposals at work?
From: Jonathan Wakely (jwakely.boost_at_[hidden])
Date: 2013-10-27 08:35:21

On 23 October 2013 15:39, Klaim - Joël Lamotte wrote:
> All is in the title: I would like to know if flat_map, flat_set and
> stable_vector have been proposed
> for inclusion in the C++ standard library, or if there are works going on
> to write such a proposal.

No proposal has reached WG21, I can't say whether anyone is working on one.

I'm against the idea that every useful container needs to be in the
standard, if you want a different set of trade-offs from the standard
containers then use different containers, either from Boost, another
library, or write your own.