Re: [boost] VC2013 1.55 beta failures

Subject: Re: [boost] VC2013 1.55 beta failures
From: Tom Kent (lists_at_[hidden])
Date: 2013-10-27 08:43:45

Trunk tests on msvc-12.0 have *finally* completed.

On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 3:11 PM, Beman Dawes <bdawes_at_[hidden]> wrote:

> On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 2:34 PM, Frank Mori Hess <fmh6jj_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 12:02 PM, Peter Dimov <lists_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> > > Beman Dawes wrote:
> > >>
> > >> Should we continue to define BOOST_NO_CXX11_VARIADIC_TEMPLATES for
> VC++
> > >> 2013, or should we not define it and get signals2 working with a
> problem
> > >> specific workaround?
> > >
> > >
> > > Get signals2 working, I'd say. The variadic constructor is already a
> bit
> > > broken in that it incorrectly accepts zero arguments, so why not just
> > > constrain it to two or more.
> > >
> > > template<class A1, class A2, class... Args>
> > > slot( A1 const& a1, A2 const& a2, Args const&... args )
> > > { ... }
> > >
> >
> > That sounds fine by me.  I can commit the change to trunk tonight,
> > should I also commit it to release, or wait for tests to cycle?
> >
>
> I've just committed (r86408), the BOOST_NO_CXX11_VARIADIC_TEMPLATES removal
> for VS 2013, but will wait roughly 24-hours to give tests a chance to cycle
> before merging to trunk. Why don't you do the same? That still meets the
> Monday for merging to release without having to ask permission.
>
> Thanks,
>
> --Beman
>
> _______________________________________________
> Unsubscribe & other changes:
> http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
>