Subject: Re: [boost] [modularization] Improving/splitting up detail
From: John Maddock (john_at_[hidden])
Date: 2013-11-02 08:24:26
>> Funnily enough I was about to suggest just that: lets do away with detail
>> and have:
>> everything in:
>> That has no dependencies.
>> As above, but with dependencies (mostly to mpl/pp/type_traits).
>> throw_exception.hpp and dependencies should go in core too, as would a
>> few headers under boost/ such as cstdint.hpp etc.
> That seems like a good idea provided that everything now in namespace
> detail remains in that namespace.
Yes, no code changes, we're just talking about which module "owns" which
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk