Re: [boost] [unordered] Visual C++ 2013 initializer_listoverloadfailure.

Subject: Re: [boost] [unordered] Visual C++ 2013 initializer_listoverloadfailure.
From: Stephan T. Lavavej (stl_at_[hidden])
Date: 2013-11-05 11:32:57

[Joaquin M Lopez Munoz]
> Maybe Stephan is reading this and can shed some light?

[Daniel James]
> Since Peter brought it up on c++std-core I assume someone from the
> compiler team would have seen that. I don't particularly want to
> report a bug for a compiler I don't have, but since it was confirmed
> that the earlier test failed, I could post that.

I need a self-contained repro in order to file a compiler bug. I am aware of DevDiv#796414 "Overloading op+=(char) and op+=(initializer_list<char>) should be unambiguous" which is still active.

STL