Subject: Re: [boost] [unordered] Visual C++ 2013 initializer_listoverloadfailure.
From: Daniel James (daniel_at_[hidden])
Date: 2013-11-05 07:34:24
On 5 November 2013 12:21, Joaquin M Lopez Munoz <joaquin_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> This looks serious enough, and, fwiw, there's another library (mine)
> suffering from seemingly the same problem:
Looks very similar. Also suggests I need to add some extra constructor tests.
> I've googled a bit and the only relevant reference I found is
> which refers to a problem supposedly fixed in the final version
> of VS 2013.
I think that's a different issue. In that case it seems that the
conversion didn't work properly. Our problem is that it isn't seeing
list initialization as a better conversion than the others.
> Maybe Stephan is reading this and can shed some light?
Since Peter brought it up on c++std-core I assume someone from the
compiler team would have seen that. I don't particularly want to
report a bug for a compiler I don't have, but since it was confirmed
that the earlier test failed, I could post that.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk