Subject: Re: [boost] [PATCH Boost.smart_ptr] Add intrusive_ptr<>::release()
From: Peter Dimov (lists_at_[hidden])
Date: 2013-12-02 13:45:25
Andrey Semashev wrote:
> The reset/release pattern is quite established in STL and Boost and I'd
> prefer not to disturb it. This will only add confusion.
I agree with Lars and Jonathan, sorry Andrey. Naming the function "release"
will add confusion even though you might argue that it will improve
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk