Boost :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Subject: Re: [boost] [PATCH Boost.smart_ptr] Add intrusive_ptr<>::release()
From: Peter Dimov (lists_at_[hidden])
Date: 2013-12-02 13:45:25

Next message: Beman Dawes: "Re: [boost] [git] Effect of "git checkout develop" on submodule?"
Previous message: Daniel James: "Re: [boost] [conversion] Progress Report"
In reply to: Andrey Semashev: "Re: [boost] [PATCH Boost.smart_ptr] Add intrusive_ptr<>::release()"
Next in thread: Avi Kivity: "Re: [boost] [PATCH Boost.smart_ptr] Add intrusive_ptr<>::release()"
Reply: Avi Kivity: "Re: [boost] [PATCH Boost.smart_ptr] Add intrusive_ptr<>::release()"

Andrey Semashev wrote:
> The reset/release pattern is quite established in STL and Boost and I'd
> prefer not to disturb it. This will only add confusion.

I agree with Lars and Jonathan, sorry Andrey. Naming the function "release"
will add confusion even though you might argue that it will improve
consistency.

Next message: Beman Dawes: "Re: [boost] [git] Effect of "git checkout develop" on submodule?"
Previous message: Daniel James: "Re: [boost] [conversion] Progress Report"
In reply to: Andrey Semashev: "Re: [boost] [PATCH Boost.smart_ptr] Add intrusive_ptr<>::release()"
Next in thread: Avi Kivity: "Re: [boost] [PATCH Boost.smart_ptr] Add intrusive_ptr<>::release()"
Reply: Avi Kivity: "Re: [boost] [PATCH Boost.smart_ptr] Add intrusive_ptr<>::release()"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk