Subject: Re: [boost] [Thread] Looking for co-maintainers
From: Niall Douglas (s_sourceforge_at_[hidden])
Date: 2013-12-07 13:47:27
On 6 Dec 2013 at 22:18, Vicente J. Botet Escriba wrote:
> The future implementation is NOT stable. I don't know when the bug was
> introduced, but it appears clearly now on the regression test as I have
> wrapped the test on a loop to increase the change of error.
Sorry, can I clarify, are you saying that the futures implementation
in present Boost.Thread is not reliable?
-- Currently unemployed and looking for work. Work Portfolio: http://careers.stackoverflow.com/nialldouglas/
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk