Subject: Re: [boost] [Thread] Looking for co-maintainers
From: Vicente J. Botet Escriba (vicente.botet_at_[hidden])
Date: 2013-12-08 12:56:06
Le 07/12/13 19:47, Niall Douglas a écrit :
> On 6 Dec 2013 at 22:18, Vicente J. Botet Escriba wrote:
>> The future implementation is NOT stable. I don't know when the bug was
>> introduced, but it appears clearly now on the regression test as I have
>> wrapped the test on a loop to increase the change of error.
> Sorry, can I clarify, are you saying that the futures implementation
> in present Boost.Thread is not reliable?
This is what the regression test says :(
I started to see this bug with the clang asan11 tester, but looping on
the test shows that the problem is not limited to this particular
I've worked hard to find out the issue but while I have found some minor
issues, I have not reached to mix all the problems that appear now on
the regression test.
If you have time to take a look at, inspect the code I will appreciate.
Now that we have git you can comment on any change I did.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk