Subject: Re: [boost] Release numbering
From: Vladimir Prus (ghost_at_[hidden])
Date: 2013-12-15 01:36:01
On 14.12.2013 23:35, Klaim - Joël Lamotte wrote:
> I find strange a change of major version number just without a major
> interface change in the code,
> as the way the code is managed is not really related to the software state.
> So it feels a bit weird.
I agree that 'we've moved to git' as major feature of 2.0 sounds quite strange. And modulaization
probably can't be major feature either - we've just sliced existing code in pieces. It is not
necessary any better or truly modular as the result. And if there are some 'real' major features
planned for 2.0, it would be really great not to mix everything together, and first release one
'normal' release at least.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk