Subject: Re: [boost] Release numbering
From: John Maddock (john_at_[hidden])
Date: 2013-12-15 03:42:51
>I agree that 'we've moved to git' as major feature of 2.0 sounds quite
>strange. And modulaization
>probably can't be major feature either - we've just sliced existing code in
>pieces. It is not
>necessary any better or truly modular as the result. And if there are some
>'real' major features
>planned for 2.0, it would be really great not to mix everything together,
>and first release one
>'normal' release at least.
I feel it's as good a time as any - the libraries may not have changed much
but the infrastructure has.
There are also a bunch of changes waiting to be merged to master which
remove support for old (pre C++98) compilers, so arguably it is a step
Just my 2c.... John.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk