Re: [boost] [range] Should html docs be checked in?

Subject: Re: [boost] [range] Should html docs be checked in?
From: Daniel James (daniel_at_[hidden])
Date: 2013-12-29 05:20:51

On 28 December 2013 20:21, Mostafa <mostafa_working_away_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>
> Speaking of documentation and the final release, every time I have to build
> boost from scratch I have to scrounge third party distros for boost
> documentation (like Ubuntu or Fedora), because it seems that there is no way
> to centralize and install the docs. If you're already building and adding
> docs to the final release, can you also add an optional install hook so that
> they may all install in one location (like share/doc/).

Not really, as there's a lot of documentation that isn't built, and
the documentation that is built often links to files in the boost
tree, or uses images from the boost tree. So if we built the
documentation at another destination, there would be a lot of files
missing.