Boost logo

Boost :

Subject: Re: [boost] [range] Should html docs be checked in?
From: Mostafa (mostafa_working_away_at_[hidden])
Date: 2013-12-29 23:10:00

On Sun, 29 Dec 2013 02:20:51 -0800, Daniel James <daniel_at_[hidden]>

> On 28 December 2013 20:21, Mostafa <mostafa_working_away_at_[hidden]>
> wrote:
>> Speaking of documentation and the final release, every time I have to
>> build
>> boost from scratch I have to scrounge third party distros for boost
>> documentation (like Ubuntu or Fedora), because it seems that there is
>> no way
>> to centralize and install the docs. If you're already building and
>> adding
>> docs to the final release, can you also add an optional install hook so
>> that
>> they may all install in one location (like share/doc/).
> Not really, as there's a lot of documentation that isn't built, and
> the documentation that is built often links to files in the boost
> tree, or uses images from the boost tree. So if we built the
> documentation at another destination, there would be a lot of files
> missing.

Then how are the files for the website documentation (i.e., build? Or are those also embedded
in the boost tree? (At times I've been tempted just to wget everything
under the latter url, since the distro docs I resort to usually are
missing css and image files, sometimes the important ones.)



Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at