Subject: Re: [boost] Call for Review: Boost.Test documentation rewrite
From: Gennadiy Rozental (rogeeff_at_[hidden])
Date: 2014-01-09 03:25:44
Beman Dawes <bdawes <at> acm.org> writes:
> On Fri, Jan 3, 2014 at 12:13 PM, Richard
> <legalize+jeeves <at> mail.xmission.com>wrote:
> > I'd rather document the current 1.55 release and move forward. It's
> > already taken over 6 months to get to this point, I see no point in
> > delaying any further.
> With all reviews in favor and none against, it seems clear you should move
> forward with this.
I hoped I still have some say in this. I outlined my concerns in another
post. I would prefer not to make any movement until we get to some consensus
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk