Subject: Re: [boost] Call for Review: Boost.Test documentation rewrite
From: Brian Wood (woodbrian77_at_[hidden])
Date: 2014-01-10 12:33:05
> I am all for working with Richard on new docs. I am just not sure this
> particular version worth time people will need to spent to get used to it.
> What Boost.Test really need is to document new release. And this is what
> should be targeting. New features and new docs look and feel will make it
> all worth while.
I'm not using this library, but I agree with Gennadiy.
-- Brian Ebenezer Enterprises - In G-d we trust. http://webEbenezer.net
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk