Subject: Re: [boost] Call for Review: Boost.Test documentation rewrite
From: Richard (legalize+jeeves_at_[hidden])
Date: 2014-01-10 14:53:46
[Please do not mail me a copy of your followup]
boost_at_[hidden] spake the secret code
>I am all for working with Richard on new docs. I am just not sure this
>particular version worth time people will need to spent to get used to it.
>What Boost.Test really need is to document new release. And this is what we
>should be targeting. New features and new docs look and feel will make it
>all worth while.
Again, I'm not sure why you didn't reply to my call for reviewers that
I posted last May.
You're saying I ignored you, but when I email you or post to the
mailing list, you don't reply.
I've posted here on this mailing list with an open call for reviewers
and 4 people responded and I've been sending those 4 people regular
snapshots for many months.
I just don't find that you're being helpful while at the same time
blaming me for not doing what you want.
-- "The Direct3D Graphics Pipeline" free book <http://tinyurl.com/d3d-pipeline> The Computer Graphics Museum <http://computergraphicsmuseum.org> The Terminals Wiki <http://terminals.classiccmp.org> Legalize Adulthood! (my blog) <http://legalizeadulthood.wordpress.com>
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk