Subject: Re: [boost] Final opinion on Re: Boost.Fiber review January 6-15
From: Vicente J. Botet Escriba (vicente.botet_at_[hidden])
Date: 2014-01-11 12:14:11
Le 11/01/14 17:29, Oliver Kowalke a écrit :
> 2014/1/11 Niall Douglas <s_sourceforge_at_[hidden]>
>> Aha! You're reusing ASIO's coroutines support as-is. For some reason
>> my old brain didn't grok this, now it does. Thank you Oliver, and for
>> putting up with my stupid questions.
> there's no such thing as a stupid question ;^)
> * More identical replication of Boost.Thread's specific APIs. Others
>> have gone into more detail on this than I, but I would add that if an
>> extension API is trivial to add, I'd say it's very likely to appear
>> in C++17 anyway.
> but I'm uncertain which one (at least if already added support for
> interruption) - but what
> about the others (many of them a conditionally compiled)?
Could you elaborate? What is the problem you find?
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk