Re: [boost] Boost.Fiber review January 6-15

Subject: Re: [boost] Boost.Fiber review January 6-15
From: Oliver Kowalke (oliver.kowalke_at_[hidden])
Date: 2014-01-12 04:52:13

2014/1/12 james <james_at_[hidden]>

> That's not in any realistic way feasible.  It might do for home-grown code
> that
> works on sockets directly, but you will be out of luck with almost any
> third
> party database library or anything else that wraps up communication or
> persistence in any way.  It also impacts code that uses libraries that have
> data structures protected by locks that might be held for extended periods
> sometimes.  Most of these will be more important to a project than fibres,
> or
> indeed boost.
>

the fiber lib is not a on-size-fits-all too