Re: [boost] Boost.Fiber review January 6-15

Subject: Re: [boost] Boost.Fiber review January 6-15
From: Oliver Kowalke (oliver.kowalke_at_[hidden])
Date: 2014-01-12 04:53:04

s/too/tool/

2014/1/12 Oliver Kowalke <oliver.kowalke_at_[hidden]>

> 2014/1/12 james <james_at_[hidden]>
>
>> That's not in any realistic way feasible.  It might do for home-grown
>> code that
>> works on sockets directly, but you will be out of luck with almost any
>> third
>> party database library or anything else that wraps up communication or
>> persistence in any way.  It also impacts code that uses libraries that
>> have
>> data structures protected by locks that might be held for extended periods
>> sometimes.  Most of these will be more important to a project than
>> fibres, or
>> indeed boost.
>>
>
> the fiber lib is not a on-size-fits-all too
>