Re: [boost] Boost.Fiber review January 6-15

Subject: Re: [boost] Boost.Fiber review January 6-15
From: Oliver Kowalke (oliver.kowalke_at_[hidden])
Date: 2014-01-13 02:36:39

2014/1/13 Antony Polukhin <antoshkka_at_[hidden]>

> 2014/1/11 Oliver Kowalke <oliver.kowalke_at_[hidden]>
>
> > 2014/1/11 Rob Stewart <robertstewart_at_[hidden]>
> >
> > > That isn't an issue when the conversion operator is explicit, which
> > > Vicente suggested.
> > >
> >
> > many other boost libraries use the safe_bool idiom - I believe it's not
> bad
> > to follow this 'common' coding practice
> >
>
> I'll try to stop the 'explicit bool operator problem' discussion by this
> link:
>
> http://www.boost.org/doc/libs/1_55_0/libs/utility/doc/html/explicit_operator_bool.html
>
> Just use the BOOST_EXPLICIT_OPERATOR_BOOL macro and let the library
> maintainer cope with explicit-bool-operator/safe_bool problem :)
>

that's fine - thank you, I'll change the code accordingly.