Subject: Re: [boost] Trying modular Boost
From: Paul A. Bristow (pbristow_at_[hidden])
Date: 2014-01-31 09:53:12
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Boost [mailto:boost-bounces_at_[hidden]] On Behalf Of Richard
> Sent: Saturday, January 04, 2014 7:29 PM
> To: boost_at_[hidden]
> Subject: Re: [boost] Trying modular Boost
> [Please do not mail me a copy of your followup]
> boost_at_[hidden] spake the secret code <CAAygHNPi_JXaB4vwEdUKa3tNxLojTZ-
> AYPcDbvsUCOobigw5TA_at_[hidden]> thusly:
> >On Thu, Jan 2, 2014 at 6:03 AM, Paul A. Bristow <pbristow_at_[hidden]>wrote:
> >> Is it worth continuing to try to get the SSH method to work?
I've had another go at using SSH, and got it working (by deleting the two is_rsa and rsa_pub files
and creating another key).
But it now asks for passphrase for every module which is clearly intolerable.
On Windows, making this not happen seems a fiddle, so before I waste more time,
is there any disadvantage in using https (over SSH)?
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk