Subject: Re: [boost] [EXTERNAL] [testing] More failed test results with no meaningful content
From: John Maddock (boost.regex_at_[hidden])
Date: 2014-02-08 04:56:26
>>> I don't think that is the issue - it's not that the output is truncated
>>> - it's that there is *no output at all*. Or rather that the link for
>>> the "failure" leads to a file which did actually compile correctly.
>> Which is not to say the report truncation isn't an issue, for example: http://www.boost.org/development/tests/develop/developer/output/BP%20x86_64%20C++11-boost-bin-v2-libs-regex-test-icu_concept_check-test-clang-linux-3-4~c11_libc++-debug-threading-multi.html displays *one* warning and that's it. What on earth am I supposed to do with that?
> If you have a question about a test thats running on one of my testers, please drop me a line, and I can run that test and send you the entire output.
For sure, but the whole idea of the reporting system is that we
shouldn't have to bother the test runners with questions like that.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk