Subject: Re: [boost] libcpp.hpp always defines BOOST_NO_CXX11_HDR_ATOMIC
From: John Maddock (boost.regex_at_[hidden])
Date: 2014-02-28 13:10:40
>> Do you have a patch that identifies when we don't need to set that macro?
> should the macro declare that the header exists, or that the
> implementation is complete?
That it exists and is reasonably useful. If more "advanced" uses hit
bugs then that's probably more of a BOOST_WORKAROUND or possibly a new
> e.g. gcc/libstdc++ did support atomic<Integral> before fully supporting
> atomic<>. likewise, clang/libc++ is broken, if the wrapped type is a
> trivially copyable class .
>  http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=18097
> Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk