Subject: Re: [boost] [variant] Why no move emulation with Boost.Move for C++03?
From: Steven Watanabe (watanabesj_at_[hidden])
Date: 2014-04-13 08:59:08
On 04/12/2014 02:33 PM, Andrzej Krzemienski wrote:
> I am trying to figure out what the best way to enable move semantics in
> Boost.Optional. I tried to pick at how Boost.Variant does it. If I
> understand correctly, move operations are only defined if compiler supports
> rvalue references. I wonder why it doesn't use Boost.Move, which would
> enable move semantics even for compilers w/o rvalue references. Is there
> any reason for this (that I should also take into account for
Boost.Move is not completely backwards
compatible. i.e. adding it to an existing
class can break user code.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk