Boost logo

Boost :

Subject: Re: [boost] Boost.Align review begins today
From: Mostafa (mostafa_working_away_at_[hidden])
Date: 2014-04-21 03:27:09

On Sun, 20 Apr 2014 23:15:02 -0700, Ahmed Charles <acharles_at_[hidden]>

> ----------------------------------------
>> To: boost_at_[hidden]
>> From: mostafa_working_away_at_[hidden]
>> Date: Sun, 20 Apr 2014 21:46:34 -0700
>> Subject: Re: [boost] Boost.Align review begins today
>> On Fri, 11 Apr 2014 20:48:02 -0700, Ahmed Charles <acharles_at_[hidden]>
>> wrote:
>> (Ahmed, a piece of advice, the review period doesn't end until the end
>> of
>> the
>> review date for all time zones.)
> Sorry for believing it was GMT/UTC based.
>>> Please always state in your review whether you think the library should
>>> beaccepted as a Boost library.
>> No. The author has unfortunately not responded to a majority of
>> questions
>> and
>> concerns I had brought up.
> Thanks for your review. I can send out an update with any additional
> conditions we can agree on, since the result is still conditional
> acceptance even with your vote, if you would like. Unfortunately, your
> initial review didn't clearly state a vote, so it wasn't included in the
> initial summary.
>> (Note: this is solely about a lack of response, and
>> not any disagreements on the direction of library which I may have with
>> the
>> author.)
> I believe the spirit of the review process is to mostly review the code
> and not the author.

My intention was to simply state the fact that without sufficient answers
to requested information my vote would have to default to a "no".

Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at