Subject: [boost] Fwd: [Boost-users] [typeindex v3.0] Peer review begins Mon 21st ends Wed 30th
From: Antony Polukhin (antoshkka_at_[hidden])
Date: 2014-04-24 01:24:14
2014-04-23 17:33 GMT+04:00 Paul A. Bristow <pbristow_at_[hidden]>:
> > 2. What is your evaluation of the implementation?
> Though I'm not enthusiastic about the name of namespace boost::typeind::
> but I
> don't have any much better ideas. Perhaps someone else has?
> Nor am I clear that this namespace bti helps the reader.
> "Through all the examples, we'll assume that the following namespace alias
> is in
> namespace bti = boost::typeind;
> IMO, the frequency of use of the namespace bti is probably so low that
> it out is clearer, for example:
> boost::typeind::type_id<T>().pretty_name() // human readable
Agreed: boost::typeindex would be more user friendly. It suggests to the
reader which library to look for.
Other notes will be also addressed.
Thanks for the review!
-- Best regards, Antony Polukhin
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk